← Search

Carolyn Haarer

Alpharetta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 43W–36L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Carolyn Haarer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Chernault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherrill Kirch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Jonna Pointer / Miia Pointer
2026-05-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Gersten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-18 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherrill Kirch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-06 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Simes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-28 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherrill Kirch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-21 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Simes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-01-15 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-14 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Noel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · Cambridge (Erika Lopez)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherrill Kirch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-11-13 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Gersten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
58.8%
40W–28L · 53.7% of games
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#2 Singles
11%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal