← Search

Rachel Simes

— year-end
52 matches · 33W–19L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Rachel Simes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-02-06 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Haarer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-21 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Haarer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-11-12 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudine Lefrancois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-05 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Haarer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-22 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-15 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Haarer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-22 · Aviary (Jessica Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amey Rishel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-25 · Aviary (Jessica Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Glass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-10 · Aviary (Jessica Wilson)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudette Stephen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherrill Kirch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 7-6
W
2025-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Noel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 6-1
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
63.5%
33W–19L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Singles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova