← Search

Edward Park

NEW YORK, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 45W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Edward Park to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-07-12 · Queens: Zhogov/Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Spencer Koh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · Abell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Spencer Koh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-6
W
2026-06-17 · Queens: Zhogov/Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-08 · Abell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jake Bowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-07 · Queens: Zhogov/Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Bomgardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-25 · Metro: Zhogov · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Jia Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · Manhattan: Choy/Zhogov · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lenny Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Queens: Zhogov/Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Manhattan: Choy/Zhogov · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-5
W
2026-04-29 · Metro: Zhogov · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · Metro: Zhogov · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · Damarasingu/Lekser · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Yu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
4.0
61.7%
29W–18L · 55.3% of games
4.5
12.5%
3W–21L · 36.7% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 53.1% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#1 Singles
17%
16 matches
#2 Singles
14%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe