← Search

Jake Bowling

New York, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 10W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jake Bowling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-06-28 · Abell · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · Abell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edward Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · Abell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edward Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5
L
2026-05-17 · Abell · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-23 · Abell · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-27 · Abell/Kelly · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jean-Na Koo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-01-20 · Abell/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kate Kelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-11 · Abell/Kelly · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Yoeur-Man Teagan MacH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-11-20 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-05 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-28 · Abell/Kelly · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nicole Kwok mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-26 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Texer Nam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 35.3% of games
4.5
50%
5W–5L · 47.5% of games
9.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#1 Singles
42%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer