← Search

Pam Decker

— year-end
52 matches · 28W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pam Decker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
Jodi Ansell / Nancy Johnson
2026-07-02 · MEA TEAL · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · MEA TEAL · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristen Royer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · with Beth Saperstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-24 · MEA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-17 · MEA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-03 · MEA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-08-07 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Cindy Ronlov / Jill Nelson
2024-07-31 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-10 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Laura Studebaker / Susan Cooper
2024-06-13 · BRMST GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharla Prom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-05-09 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-05-02 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 49.5% of games
6.0
75%
12W–4L · 58.2% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe