← Search

Cindy Ronlov

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 119W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Ronlov to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
W
2026-09-03 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Torey Kirkpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Georgann Lott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Misgen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-28 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · RCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Highley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · RCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ronacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · RCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ronacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · RCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Hickler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · RCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ronacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
58.6%
58W–41L · 53.8% of games
7.0
71.7%
43W–17L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer