← Search

Michael Huffman

Lacey, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 116W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Huffman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
L
2026-06-13 · LRC-Huffman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Laskowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · SWW-GTC-Boling · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Al Boling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-2
W
2026-05-02 · VAC-Huffman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Redding mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · SWW-GTC-Boling · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Al Boling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · with Melanie Redding championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Craig Berry / Sally Berry
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · with Melanie Redding championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janie Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-28 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janie Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-08 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams96 teams · 2003–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 55.8% of games
4.5
50%
7W–7L · 54% of games
7.0
74.4%
32W–11L · 62.2% of games
8.0
76%
19W–6L · 61.3% of games
9.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
45 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal