← Search

Nancy Conner

— year-end
46 matches · 26W–20L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Nancy Conner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-07-24 · TCU CARDENAS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · TCU CARDENAS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Caroline Archuleta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-10 · TCU CARDENAS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tricia Spann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-03 · TCU CARDENAS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-11 · TCU SCOTT · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · with Susan May championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · TCU SCOTT · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · RTC COOPER/FRIZZELL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Tallent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · RTC CATES · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Stokes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-06 · TCU SCOTT · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bonnie Sudderth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-03 · RTC COOPER/FRIZZELL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Karen Brown / Mary Buffington
2026-03-24 · TCU SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.6% of games
6.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert