← Search

Cathy Greenwood

Columbia, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 60W–49L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Cathy Greenwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-03-11 · CTL40/Pittman/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daria McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Arlene Wilkes / Linda Sims
2026-03-01 · LATA40/Sutton/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-12 · CTL40/Pittman/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Pittman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-11-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daria McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Jennifer Wilson / Anny Zalesne
2025-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Pittman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daria McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daria McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-09-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Pittman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-08-27 · LATA40/Sutton/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Carol Heebner / Leanne Reynolds
2025-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janie Mucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-07-30 · LATA40/Sutton/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Duhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
64.8%
46W–25L · 56.4% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 41.3% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.4% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer