← Search

Windy Campbell

— year-end
58 matches · 20W–38L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Windy Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-10 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · CCV Bartzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridgit Kreutzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · CCV Bartzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · Southampton Sara Brown · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Southampton Sara Brown · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · Southampton Sara Brown · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lockhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-27 · Southampton Sara Brown · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-13 · Southampton Sara Brown · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · Ridgetop - Scammell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.1% of games
4.0
7.1%
1W–13L · 37.8% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 40.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#1 Singles
26%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams