← Search

Ariana Dickens

North Chesterfield, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 46W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Ariana Dickens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-09-06 · ACAC No Strings Attached - Jones · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jodi Tandett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · ACAC No Strings Attached - Jones · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gail Cavallaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · ACAC No Strings Attached - Jones · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Martinique Kandl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · ACAC Bivins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · ACAC Bivins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fay Crawshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · ACAC Bivins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cecilia Bergh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · ACAC Krebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · ACAC Krebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-11 · ACAC Krebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · ACAC Bivins · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mari Litz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · 8 ACAC Dickens · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Cole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-02-07 · 8 ACAC Dickens · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kurt Shores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.9% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 39% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.1% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.5% of games
6.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert