← Search

Laura McCracken

— year-end
127 matches · 50W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laura McCracken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-05-20 · Green Valley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Adornetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · Doylestown Dreamers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Tuosto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-05 · Doylestown Dreamers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynda Heflich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-31 · WINTER CTRL/Dynamic Duos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-23 · WINTER CTRL/Dynamic Duos · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Krongard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Gena Maresca championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Chantal Meldrum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-10 · Gino Gals II · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sena Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-28 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Scherffel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-4
L
2025-06-22 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gena Maresca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-20 · DTC Tennis Junkies · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gena Maresca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danai Hanrahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
37.2%
32W–54L · 42.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.9% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 53.7% of games
8.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams