← Search

Gena Maresca

CHALFONT, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 70W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gena Maresca to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-07-22 · DTC 55 Summer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Cassidy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Calaquian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-27 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chantal Meldrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Plum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-09 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lan Luo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · Expendables 7 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martin Ramos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-12 · Net Sisters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Carpineta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-29 · Net Sisters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Carpineta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-18 · Net Sisters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chantal Meldrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-20 · Net Sisters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Zhuo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-25 · Doylestown Tri-Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Scherffel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-18 · Doylestown Tri-Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Corona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40.4%
46W–68L · 43.4% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.9% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.7% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 32.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal