← Search

Mari Jones

— year-end
251 matches · 91W–160L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mari Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history251 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Shot Queens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharyl Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with SONIA HAYES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · 10s STARS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vickie Gorton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-26 · Day Stars · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vickie Gorton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · 10s STARS · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Pilcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-18 · Day Stars · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
Lawre Everest / Sarah Schmidt
2026-05-15 · Swirls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Gorton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-13 · 10s STARS · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vickie Gorton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nev Natalie von Hahmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams55 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.1% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games
3.5
28.1%
34W–87L · 41.2% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.6% of games
7.0
39.2%
40W–62L · 45.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
64 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer