← Search

Carrie Erlewine

Charleston, WV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 25W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carrie Erlewine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
Lisa Hughes / Jimmie Baker
2026-04-25 · CTC Murad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · CTC Murad · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-12-13 · CTC Murad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Murad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Kathy Wilson / Tondrea Davis-Powell
2025-09-28 · CTC Murad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Spriggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-09-20 · CTC Murad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Ballard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-13 · TVTC Porter · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Dianne Fleming
2025-04-12 · CTC Murad · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-12 · TVTC Porter · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-16 · TVTC Porter · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-12-12 · CTC Greene · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-11-22 · CTC Jarrett · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Spriggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-20 · CTC Greene · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aileen Stacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.8% of games
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 55.5% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 30.4% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
14%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert