← Search

Dean Morse

Medina, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 49W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dean Morse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-06-29 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Baranek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Baranek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-08 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-10 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-05-20 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Doug Varian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-13 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-07-15 · A18 4.5M 2 HHS Baranek · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-07-10 · OH NEO A40 4.5M Morse · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-26 · OH NEO A40 4.5M Morse · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2024-06-19 · OH NEO A40 4.5M Morse · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mollison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-05 · OH NEO A40 4.5M Morse · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-03 · A18 4.5M 2 HHS Baranek · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jarad Pennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
77.3%
34W–10L · 58.8% of games
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#1 Singles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams