← Search

Christopher Baranek

Akron, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 128W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christopher Baranek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 3 PW Fleischer · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Purdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 3 PW Fleischer · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Purdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dean Morse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · A18 4.0M 3 PW Fleischer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Lonsway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gene Nasierowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · A18 4.0M 3 PW Fleischer · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trent Binger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · A18 4.0M 3 PW Fleischer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Spencer Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas Michalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
85%
34W–6L · 61.8% of games
4.5
55.2%
32W–26L · 47.9% of games
5.0
20%
1W–4L · 36.7% of games
7.5
70%
14W–6L · 58.8% of games
8.5
56.8%
21W–16L · 56.4% of games
7.0mixed
78.8%
26W–7L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
39 matches
#1 Singles
15%
29 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King