← Search

Andrew Gillespie

Wilmington, NC
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 20W–1L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Andrew Gillespie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
Daniel Boehling / Robert Weins
2026-08-31 · Manfredi/Gillespie · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Edward Janosko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · Manfredi/Gillespie · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julio Olaechea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Manfredi/Gillespie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Harrison Kent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · Manfredi/Gillespie · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julio Olaechea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · Gillespie/Eakin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Eakin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-21 · Gillespie/Eakin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Eakin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-15 · Gillespie/Eakin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Novak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Gillespie/Eakin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Eakin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · Gillespie/Eakin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Scott Buchanan / Rodrigo Lara
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · with Corbin Carroll championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
100%
9W–0L · 68.9% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 58.1% of games
4.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Singles
19%
4 matches
#2 Singles
14%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams