← Search

Jennifer Grobeck

Flowery Branch, GA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
19 matches · 6W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Grobeck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-07-15 · City Park- Hermes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peggy Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-03 · Brenau-Bettencourt · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Bettencourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · City Park- Hermes · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Bettencourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · City Park- Hermes · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peggy Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2025-11-13 · Alberta Banks-Kmieciak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-10-23 · Alberta Banks-Kmieciak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Kmieciak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-16 · Alberta Banks-Kmieciak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Grobeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
Mary Miller / Jennifer Watson
2025-08-04 · NEGTA/Jody Nieves · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-23 · City Park-Hermes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-26 · Brenau-Caldwell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Grobeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · City Park-Hermes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Werren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Jennifer Watson / Lecretia Scondras
2025-06-23 · NEGTA/Jody Nieves · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jody Nieves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer