← Search

Alap Shah

Columbus, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 42W–43L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Alap Shah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Jung-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · Dodsworth-CC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-19 · Dodsworth-CC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-25 · Desai-GI · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Andrew Borromeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · Desai-GI · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Ammerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
David Mann / Jeremy Morris
2026-07-15 · Simmons-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Boles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Desai-GI · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zachary Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · Juestel/Soto-Ramos-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanne Huff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
John Morris / Pearlie Jenkins
2026-06-22 · Juestel/Mardis-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with India Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Juestel/Mardis-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with India Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-19 · Juestel/Soto-Ramos-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Juestel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-18 · Juestel/Mardis-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosana Juestel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
3.5
63%
29W–17L · 57.3% of games
4.0
25.8%
8W–23L · 42.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Singles
20%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal