← Search

Nathan Gehman

— year-end
53 matches · 32W–21L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Nathan Gehman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-09-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Trawick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · Bothra-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Simmons-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · CORTA/Neil Desai · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Groce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Williams-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginelle Weissinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-12 · deQuadros-GI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Penner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · Edmonson-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Kennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-09 · Edmonson-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Kennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · Hinkle-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Boles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Hinkle-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Paul Divers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-15 · Edmonson-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Boles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Hinkle-CC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.2% of games
4.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 55.2% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer