← Search

Maja Flannery

— year-end
172 matches · 105W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maja Flannery to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
L
2026-07-18 · QRRC-Fishman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Whitcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · QRRC-Saunders · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irina Titova-Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-15 · KTC-Wille · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Racquel Reyes-Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · KTC-Wille · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irina Titova-Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · QRRC-Chamberlain · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonja Smallwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · KTC-Wille · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irina Titova-Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Beth Brown / Sunhe Rhee
2026-02-24 · QRRC-Saunders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irina Titova-Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-0
L
Mary Miller / Terrie Wiley
2026-02-18 · KTC-Wille · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Racquel Reyes-Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-09 · QRRC-Chamberlain · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Kunkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irina Titova-Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-05 · QRRC Chamberlain · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-12-20 · QRRC Fishman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marianne Saunders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
64.8%
46W–25L · 56.1% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.4% of games
7.0
70.9%
39W–16L · 57.3% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams