← Search

Pamela Disser

— year-end
195 matches · 88W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pamela Disser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
L
2026-05-11 · QRRC-Pickrel · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Leadman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-01 · KTC-Howitt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sunhe Rhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-1
L
2026-04-24 · KTC-Howitt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sunhe Rhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · QRRC-Howitt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sunhe Rhee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · QRRC-Pickrel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Spitler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-4, 1-0
L
Christy Smith / Linda Thomas
2026-03-24 · QRRC-Howitt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Wineberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · KTC-Howitt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Silvert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-2
L
2026-02-23 · QRRC-Pickrel · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim McCrae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-02 · QRRC-Pickrel · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Beth Brown / Deborah Whitcomb
2026-01-19 · QRRC-Pickrel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim McCrae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-12 · QRRC Pickrel · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58.8%
47W–33L · 52.8% of games
4.0
14.8%
4W–23L · 33.9% of games
7.0
59.3%
32W–22L · 53.2% of games
8.0
14.7%
5W–29L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova