← Search

Candi Baranski

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 65W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Candi Baranski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-04-14 · Laugh Lines · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Stedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · Laugh Lines · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Atherton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Sue Danner / Cheryl Schwartz
2026-03-03 · Laugh Lines · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · No Drama Llamas 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vedah Halberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · Senior Moments · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Atherton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Jeani Voss / Jacqueline Czeiska
2026-02-19 · Laugh Lines · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pilcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-16 · Senior Moments · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hedy Kurland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Patrice Busch / Alison Sullivan
2026-01-05 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Pilcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-12-29 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Pilcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-22 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Pilcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
Paula Cartwright / Jan Westemeier
2025-12-15 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Pilcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
43.2%
16W–21L · 48.7% of games
4.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 39% of games
7.0
63.5%
40W–23L · 56.9% of games
8.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 35.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer