← Search

Elaine Overlund

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 43W–87L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elaine Overlund to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-07-19 · Mixed Plate · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Overlund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · Mixed Plate · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Gray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · Mixed Plate · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Overlund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · Mixed Plate · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Overlund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caryn Barman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Callie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-29 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · Mixed Plate · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Overlund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Buizer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Tomasa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-16 · Mixed Plate · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Gray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.9% of games
3.5
31%
27W–60L · 44.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 28.6% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 55.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.1% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams