← Search

Barbara Caropolo

WILMINGTON, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 43W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Barbara Caropolo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Anderson/Scheer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Utz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Haskins · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patty Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Egger/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristin Main
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · Caropolo 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · Caropolo 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · Caropolo 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike O'Beirne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · Caropolo 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike O'Beirne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Wilson 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracie McCabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · Haskins · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Hendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Wilson 40+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracie McCabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Haskins · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tess Casals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Haskins · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Boehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 52.4% of games
7.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 64.2% of games
8.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova