← Search

Catherine Gillett

Rockville Centre, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 116W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Gillett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
W
2026-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Haiduk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marianne Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marianne Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with LaDonna Yousha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with DIANA ALLEYNE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Eva Lesniak / Wendy Heller
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marianne Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-27 · Carefree, Aviles/Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Schettino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Carefree, Aleksiewicz/Scarselli · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frances Beyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nerissa Lem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-20 · Carefree, Aleksiewicz/Ubertini · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Marianne Russo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · Carefree, Aleksiewicz/Ubertini · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
62.3%
48W–29L · 54.1% of games
3.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.8% of games
6.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.2% of games
7.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.6% of games
6.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
63 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer