← Search

Catherine Frantz

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 29W–38L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Catherine Frantz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Casto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Causing a Racquet · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Casto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · Causing a Racquet · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Casto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · Causing a Racquet · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Casto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-11 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ilse Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-11 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Duke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Shannon Weisblatt / Ann Mitchell
2026-02-10 · Causing a Racquet · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Hagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-04 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Laird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-21 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Waldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-22 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
54.3%
25W–21L · 52.9% of games
4.5
19%
4W–17L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova