← Search

David Belman

Columbia, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 41W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add David Belman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-09-08 · CTL40/Pool/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Branham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Coleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · CTL40/CLARK/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Coleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wanda Pipes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-20 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Houser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-12 · CTL40/CLARK/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Steck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-02 · CTL18/Johnson/TP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Cornell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · CTL18/Johnson/TP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Cornell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-19 · CTL18/Johnson/TP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-12 · CTL18/Johnson/TP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter O'steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · CTL18/Johnson/TP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Cornell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-12-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Cornell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56.8%
25W–19L · 51.1% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.1% of games
3.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams