← Search

Daniel McDill

Brandon, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 19W–25L · seasons 2023–2025

Captains: add Daniel McDill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2025-09-15 · Peacock, Ken · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denny Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-08 · Peacock, Ken · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denny Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-04 · Peacock, Ken · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denny Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-04-30 · Peacock, Ken · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Hollingshead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-13 · Germany, Brian · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Bokros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-30 · Germany, Brian · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitch Stentiford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-26 · Peacock, Ken · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-23 · Germany, Brian · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Germany
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-05 · Peacock, Ken · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-02-26 · Peacock, Ken · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-09 · Germany, Brian · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitch Stentiford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-02-02 · Germany, Brian · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitch Stentiford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 48.7% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.5% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer