Laura Bassier
51 matches · 28W–23L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add Laura Bassier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history51 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams15 teams · 2021–2025
5PEACH-RUSU 70DW TH 55&O SEM F3
6PEACH-SWIDERSKI 70DW FRI 65&O SEM
1PEACH-RUSU AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F3
2PEACH-PARROTT AD40&O MO 35 NW SEM F3
2PEACH-PARROTT AD55&O TU 70 NW SEM F3
4PEACH-PARROTT 65WOMEN SEM F4
4PEACH-SANDERS AD65&O FRI 70 WOMEN SEM
2PEACH-ERFURT AD55&O 70NW TU SEM F1
2PEACH-PARROTT AD40&O 35NW WED SEM F4
3PEACH-RUSU AD55&O 70DW TH SEM F1
4PEACH-PARROTT 6.5W COMBO SEM F2
3PEACH-PARROTT 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F4
5PEACH-RUSU 70DW 55&O AD THURS SEM F2
3PEACH-MAZUR 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F6
5PEACH-ERFURT 70NW 55&O AD TUES SEM F2
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 50.8% of games
7.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 57.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.