← Search

Barbara Brown

Traverse City, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 77W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Team Steele · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valerie Dvorak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · Team Steele · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Lee Bretz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · BT-McMahon 55s 7.0 DW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Dekar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-17 · Team Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hilary Gessner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-17 · Team Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Isenhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Team Brown · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Devey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · Team Brown · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Devey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Danuta Radzio / Julie Gardzinski
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Read championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Irina Titova-Spang / Maja Flannery
2025-10-24 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Read championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-12 · Team Lowe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucia Elden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-26 · 3BT-MCMAHON 70DW TH 55&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Read
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-06 · 4BT-HELLER 70DW FRI 65&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Read
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.5% of games
3.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 54.8% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 41.7% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
55.9%
19W–15L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert