← Search

Coleman Cox

Louisville, KY
5.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
70 matches · 53W–17L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Coleman Cox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-02 · KY/LOU/GRACIN · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lilah Shallcross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · KY/LOU/GRACIN · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lilah Shallcross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
Nathan Smith / Carolina Barboza
2026-07-12 · KY/LOU/GRACIN · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carmen Schreiber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
John DeVries / Martin Mikeska
2021-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Mathes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Andrew Post / Brendon Pacheco
2021-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Homan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Michael Kathary / Gabe Higgs-Horwell
2021-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lanny Rubin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
Ted Becker / Jamie Marksberry
2021-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Brett Hoch
2021-03-14 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lanny Rubin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Adam Schrock / Daniel Skuce
2021-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Yadegari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Scott Baker / Brent Hiles
2021-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Esber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Brett Hoch
2021-01-24 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
85.4%
41W–7L · 57.3% of games
5.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 46.9% of games
5.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
28 matches
#1 Singles
34%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal