← Search

Carolina Barboza

Louisville, KY
5.0D year-end 2026
i
Disqualification — a rule enforcement, not a computed rating
15 matches · 9W–6L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Carolina Barboza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
Carmen Schreiber / Roberto Aspillaga
2026-08-02 · KY/LOU/FIDLER/ZIPSE · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Stephen Pobst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-5
W
Michael Johnson / Carmen Schreiber
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/FIDLER/ZIPSE · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Mason Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
Coleman Cox / Carmen Schreiber
2026-07-12 · KY/LOU/FIDLER/ZIPSE · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nathan Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LOU/JACKSON · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Amy Scheumann
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/JACKSON · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-28 · KY/LOU/JACKSON · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Carmen Schreiber
2026-03-15 · KY/LOU/JACKSON · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-05-25 · KY/LOU/ACKERMAN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Dunn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-28 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aimee Ackermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-09-21 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Kane-Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-09-07 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Matter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-04 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Matter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.4% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59% of games
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 60% of the time
#2 Doubles
60%
9 matches
#1 Singles
20%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match
#2 Singles
7%
1 match
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal