← Search

Chris Reed

— year-end
16 matches · 8W–8L · seasons 2025–2025

Captains: add Chris Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2025-07-24 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Maio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-22 · PGibson/APatrocino (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-15 · PGibson/APatrocino (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Sutherland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-03 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Maio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-01 · PGibson/APatrocino (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Sutherland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-29 · PGibson/APatrocino (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Burks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-26 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Atiba Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-06-19 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randall Maddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-10 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-04-23 · EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-03 · EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-27 · EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Singh B Dhillon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams9 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.3% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe