← Search

Michael Maio

— year-end
34 matches · 15W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Michael Maio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-09-08 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Keegan Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Keegan Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · MJarzynski (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alec Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · with Alec Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with Alec Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Karasik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Karasik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Karasik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-02 · BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michal Jarzynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-26 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alec Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Shamanis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-05 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michal Jarzynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert