Emily Lund
Chicago, IL
457 matches · 300W–157L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Emily Lund to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history457 matches
W
Jeanne Whisler / Joanna Taft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-3, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams147 teams · 2020–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E M18.7.0 5.McF Baltazar Fri 8 $25
CHI E M40.7.0 4.McF Baltazar Sat 6 $25
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 3Cent Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 4Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 8Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E M18&O7.0 6McFet Baltazar Fri 8 $25
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW6.5 3.Nbk Shin Sat 10 $28
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S M18&O7.0 5.McFet Baltazar Sat 5 $25
CDTA S TriWLo 7.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW6.5 3.Gnvw Shin Sun 3 $21
CDTA W ComboW7.5 4.Herit Eisner Sun 3 $25
CDTA W ComboX7.5 7.McFet Baltazar Sat 6 $25
CDTA W TriWLo 5.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 3 $21
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
CHI F CW6.5 4.Gnvw Shin Sun 3 $21
CHI F CX7.5 8.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 5 $21
NITA E 35W40e Wilmette-Lam
NITA E 40W40c River Trails-Lund/Lam
NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.5% of games
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.1% of games
3.5
70.6%
154W–64L · 57.5% of games
4.0
56.8%
25W–19L · 55.6% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 40.7% of games
7.5
50%
21W–21L · 50.1% of games
7.0mixed
76%
57W–18L · 60% of games
7.5mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 48.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
178 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
161 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
114 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.