Sara Olson
205 matches · 140W–65L · seasons 2020–2026
Captains: add Sara Olson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history205 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
Courtney Conway / Christine Marschall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams70 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 1.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 6.ACN Sheridan Sat 4 $24
NITA E 40W18a River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA E 40W40g Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 1Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 6Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $25
CDTA E M40&O8.0 3RT Lam2 Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 2.Tam Wright Fri 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $22
CDTA S M40&O8.0 3.RT Lam-2 Sat 5 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 2.Courts+ Anderson Fri 7 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 5.Nielsen Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 5.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 10.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 3.RT Stathopoulos Sun 6 $27
CDTA W M40&O8.0 2.RT Lam-2 Sat 7 $27
CDTA W TriWLo 3.Courts Anderson Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W TriWMid 4.Nielsen Lund Sun 3 $22
NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA E 40W40b Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson
NITA S 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA S 40W40c Oak Brook-Lukas
NITA S 75CMXd Salt Creek-Jones
NITA W 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA W 40W40c Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson
NITA W 75CWa Hinsdale-Kamenev/Hennessy
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 60.9% of games
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 60.5% of games
3.5
67.4%
29W–14L · 56.9% of games
4.0
58.1%
36W–26L · 56.8% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
68.4%
39W–18L · 59.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
45 matches
#1 Singles
14%
28 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Champions keep playing until they get it right.