← Search

Alison Ferreira

HOLLY SPRINGS, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 115W–123L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alison Ferreira to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-07-13 · TOC.Hutchens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Herschman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · TOC.Hutchens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Smita Shukla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-18 · TOC.Hutchens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · TOC.Hutchens · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · TOC.Hutchens · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-25 · NMAC.Grasser · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · NMAC.Grasser · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · NMAC.Grasser · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-09 · NMAC.Grasser · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-30 · TOC.Hutchens · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · NMAC.Grasser · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Yvette LeGrande
2026-03-22 · NMAC.Grasser · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.7% of games
3.0
56.1%
64W–50L · 55.3% of games
3.5
22%
9W–32L · 37% of games
5.5
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.6% of games
6.5
31%
9W–20L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
27 matches
#2 Singles
9%
21 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer