← Search

Deanna Hart

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 35W–63L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Deanna Hart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-08-30 · MD.Scroggins · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Moses
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-29 · MD.Englert · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Ashley Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · MD.Merchant · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · MD.Englert · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jessica Tanaka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-29 · MD.Hart · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · MD.Hart · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaclyn Englert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · MD.Hart · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · MD.Hart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · MD.Hart · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · MD.King · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · MD.Hart · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dabney Sninski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · MD.King · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 41.7% of games
3.0
29.5%
13W–31L · 41.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.1% of games
5.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 43.3% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 41% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer