← Search

Lauren Sutphin

— year-end
100 matches · 41W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lauren Sutphin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
Mary Cook / Mary Veloso
2026-08-23 · YMCA Parker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelby King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · YMCA Cochran · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Melton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · YMCA Parker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vida Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · YMCA Cochran · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with L Cochran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-14 · 7827 St. Clair · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan St Clair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-12 · 7827 St. Clair · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Busch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · 7827 St. Clair · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Teichman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-15 · 7827 St. Clair · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Sneed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-14 · TIC Ream · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Ream
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · 7827 St. Clair · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Busch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-10 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-03 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Swecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.2% of games
3.5
39.6%
19W–29L · 45.7% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 43% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 49.3% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 57.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams