← Search

Bill Lacock

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 36W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bill Lacock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-07-02 · SS-H PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lou Gobis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Shaheen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lou Gobis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · SS-H BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blake Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gerry Cabot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-13 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lou Gobis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gerry Cabot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
Brad Meister / Jerry Maglio
2025-08-07 · SS-H PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gerry Cabot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-07-31 · SS-H PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-24 · SS-H PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-07-17 · SS-H PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
7.0
47.5%
19W–21L · 48.4% of games
8.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.8% of games
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe