← Search

Katherine Foulk

Geneva, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 71W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katherine Foulk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-07-13 · #4 Doubles · with Kerry Sproles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · #4 Doubles · with Becky Cusick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-12 · Orange-Dionne · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Terri Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · Orange-Dionne · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Becky Cusick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · Orange-Dionne · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Sproles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · Orange-Dionne · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erika Nigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · Orange-Dionne · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Danielle Wilder
2025-10-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Susan Doerr / Elizabeth Roberts
2025-10-25 · #4 Doubles · with Kelly Banes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-10-24 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Davida Dinerman
2025-10-24 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
67.4%
29W–14L · 57.8% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 53.7% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
9.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
26 matches
#1 Singles
24%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova