← Search

Edmund Fitzpatrick

Lorain, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 39W–26L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Edmund Fitzpatrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2025-08-10 · NWO 65&Over 8.0Men Hoover/Flacks- · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Levy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-08-03 · NWO 65&Over 8.0Men Hoover/Flacks- · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Levy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-17 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-21 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chuck Roman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-05-31 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Lockert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Doug Shafer / Craig Tammen
2024-11-22 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Friesen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-07-14 · OH NEO A65 8.0M Flacks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Frey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
Daniel Palermo / David Cole
2024-07-08 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victor Trzeciak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Martin Birze / Mark Weller
2024-07-07 · OH NEO A65 8.0M Flacks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-06-03 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Limberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-20 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
David Roberts / David Misner
2024-02-18 · #2 Doubles · with Kevin Friesen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 46.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
92.6%
25W–2L · 67% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 52.2% of games
9.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova