← Search

Jennifer Kang

Louisville, KY
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 29W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Kang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LOU/KULL/LAMPTON · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Lattis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · KY/LOU/KULL/LAMPTON · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/KULL/LAMPTON · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patricia Hooker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-27 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justina Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Whitsell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cara Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Mary King / Anna Tomes
2026-01-03 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Knific
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-01-15 · KY/LOU/LAMPTON/KULL · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Lauren Lane / Michelle Brooks
2024-09-15 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL(NPC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tiffany Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-04 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL(NPC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sara Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-20 · KY/LOU/HOLLIS/KANG · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-07-06 · KY/LOU/HOLLIS/KANG · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 75.2% of games
4.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 53.5% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe