← Search

Amanda Rassiga

Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 36W–35L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amanda Rassiga to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
Andrea Ring / Melanie Young
2026-08-13 · KY/LOU/WARREN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · KY/LOU/WARREN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mason McIntyre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · KY/LOU/WARREN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clay Watkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-28 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebekkah Rechter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-22 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-14 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-01-30 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-18 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 68.2% of games
4.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 50.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–11L · 30.2% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.9% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.8% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#2 Singles
23%
16 matches
#1 Singles
18%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer