← Search

Deidra Engle

Dublin, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 73W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deidra Engle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Peercy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Zivick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Eisnaugle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Smith Henson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsay Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Schembechler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Jarrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julia Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2026-02-15 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Eisnaugle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-01 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Smith Henson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-21 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julia Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Mary Beasecker / Sarah Brown
2025-12-14 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Kinnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
72.3%
60W–23L · 59.8% of games
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer