← Search

Mary Beasecker

— year-end
228 matches · 156W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Beasecker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
W
2026-05-17 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Klingerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bethany Billi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Fiorentini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
W
2026-03-18 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maya Dewi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
L
Jireh Groenow / Katie Lee
2026-03-15 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Shea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-11 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maya Dewi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-02-15 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Fiorentini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erica Klingerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-14 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
84.3%
86W–16L · 61.8% of games
4.5
44.1%
30W–38L · 49.3% of games
7.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.8% of games
8.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 59.9% of games
8.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
67 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams