← Search

Erica Klingerman

New Albany, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 59W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erica Klingerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-08-26 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zach Polcyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zach Polcyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Beasecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Lerg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
L
2026-02-15 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Lerg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-01 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Beasecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-11 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Lerg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-14 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Lerg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
54.5%
55W–46L · 52.2% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal