← Search

Alice Curtiss

Buffalo, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 152W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alice Curtiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Stohl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with April Zolczer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Stohl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Stohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Stohl championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Sally Abell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Stohl · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Stohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Stohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Stohl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Plimpton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Stohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · Sage/Stohl · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Plimpton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · BUF: Smith/Benz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Stohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · Sage/Stohl · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Stohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Gurske-DePerio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
71.6%
68W–27L · 57.6% of games
4.0
36%
9W–16L · 45.2% of games
7.0
69%
20W–9L · 57.1% of games
8.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.8% of games
7.0mixed
77.1%
27W–8L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
61 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe